Anthropologie Structurale [C Levi-Strauss] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This reissue of a classic will reintroduce readers to Lévi-Strauss’s understanding of man and society in terms of individuals—kinship, social organization, religion. Get this from a library! Anthropologie structurale.. [Claude Lévi-Strauss].
|Published (Last):||18 November 2018|
|PDF File Size:||14.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Men sought to stauss the maximum profit in forms of either bridewealth or political advantage from their daughters’ marriage. He showed too that the ways people initially categorized animals, treesand other natural features, were based on a series of oppositions.
Through the gift, the givers give part of themselves, imbuing the gift a certain power that compels a response.
African tribal societies employ descent as their primary organizational principle.
Another concept was borrowed from the Prague school of linguisticswhich employed so-called binary oppositions in their research. He showed, for example, how anthropologle ideas would fight and were resolved to establish the rules of marriagemythology and ritual.
By overstressing the structural significance of affinal ties, alliance theory effectively anthro;ologie the importance of descent and genealogical ties.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Leach argued that they are also or even primarily economic and political transactions and are frequently connected to transfers of rights over land, too.
For them, social structures were primarily shaped by material conditions, property relations and class struggles.
Matrilateral cross-cousin marriage arrangements where the marriage of the parents is repeated by successive generations are very common in parts of Asia e. These status inequalities can destabilise the entire system or can at least lead to an accumulation of wives and in the case of the Kachin, also of bridewealth at one end of the chain. Generalised exchange straus more integrative but contains an implicit hierarchy, as e.
The “Leiden” perspective drove research for many decades, influencing successive generations of anthropologists. This involves anthropoologie asymmetric exchange between at least three groups. He called the three kinship structures elementary, semi-complex and complex.
BatakMinangkabauMoluccasetc. Elementary structures can operate based on two forms of exchange: Boyer pointed out that experimental research on concepts in psychology have not supported a structuralistic view of concepts, but rather a theory-oriented or prototype-based view.
Consequently, the last wife-taking group in the chain is significantly inferior to the first wife-giving group to which sturcturale is supposed to give its wives. Kuper allowed that exchange was the universal form of marriage, but there struss be other significant factors. For example, in the Amazon basin, two extended families would build their houses in two facing semicircles that together form a big circle.
While part of his analysis of the Kachin was simply based on incorrect ethnographic information, the rest reflected Kachin ideology but not actual practice.
Anthropologie structurale deux – Wikipedia
sfructurale Archaeological Biological Cultural Linguistic Social. Leach was more concerned with researching people’s actual lives than with the discovery of universal mental structures. This article needs additional citations for verification.
Structural anthropology – Wikipedia
This type anthrppologie anthropology, developed by late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century scholars, was eventually called “de Leidse Richting,” or “de Leidse School,”. According to Leach, in Kachin reality instabilities arose primarily anthropologiie competition for bridewealth. In theory, Kachin groups were supposed to marry in a circle ideally consisting of five groups. Mauss argued that gifts are not free, but rather oblige the recipient to reciprocate. The risk created by such a delayed return is obviously lowest in restricted exchange systems.
Others, for example Godelier, critiqued structuralism’s synchronic approach that led it to be essentially ahistorical. Social relationships are therefore based on exchange; Durkheimian solidarity, according to Mauss, is best achieved through structures of reciprocity and related systems of exchange. Views Read Edit View history. Much earlier, and some miles north of Paris, a specific anthroplogie of applied anthropology emerged at Leiden UniversityNetherlands that focused frequently on the relationship between apparent cultural phenomena found in the Indonesian archipelago: Accordingly, he grouped all possible kinship systems into a scheme containing three basic kinship structures constructed out of two types of exchange.